trademark law
About Trademarks
Trademark Process
Trademark Search
Our Clients
Why Achtel Law Firm, APC
 

 

Strength of trademarks

Not all trademarks are created equal. Certain marks are inherently stronger than other marks. Furthermore, famous marks are subject to additional protection by U.S. law. The strength of a trademark is determined by the classification of the trademark or term as either:

Fanciful trademarks- Fanciful marks are words that do not have a dictionary definition (in English or other language); they are simply made up words. These are the strongest type of trademark and usually proceed to registration without major hurdles from the US Patent and Trademark Office. To be fanciful, the mark must not have any other meaning.

Examples of fanciful trademarks include "Kodak" and "Clorox."

Arbitrary trademarks- These are words that are commonly used, however they are used in a context that is meaningless to the good or service associated with the mark.

Examples of arbitrary marks include "Oracle" for software, "Arrowhead" for water, and "Apple" for computers.

Suggestive trademarks- These are marks that suggest some sort of quality or characteristic of the product or service associated with the mark. There still has to be some sort of imaginative leap for the consumer when viewing the mark- the mark cannot completely describe the goods or services. Suggesting too much will make the mark be classified as descriptive and thus much weaker.

Examples of suggestive marks include "Coppertone" for sun tan lotion and "Greyhound" for bus lines. As greyhound dogs are fast runners and are often used in dog races, customers might associate their speed with a quick travel service.

Descriptive- These are the weakest protectable trademarks. A descriptive trademark immediately describes the underlying goods or services, without any imagination from consumers. Descriptive marks can eventually become stronger after long use in the marketplace.

An example of descriptive mark is "Joe's 15 Minute Oil Change."

A federal trademark application for a descriptive mark will likely be be allowed to register on the Supplemental Trademark Register, as opposed to the Principal Trademark Register. A descriptive mark may be allowed to register on the Principal Trademark Register if it has been used continually in commerce for five years. Click either of the following links for a detailed description of the differences between the Principal Register and the Supplemental Register.

Generic terms- There is no protection for generic terms and so they are not considered trademarks at all. A generic term is a term that is used to describe an item by calling it by its common name. For example you could not trademark the word "Soap" for soap. But you could use an adjective such as "Sudsy" and have a descriptive mark for "Sudsy Soap".

Famous marks often have a problem with becoming too associated with a particular good or service, and can sometimes become an unprotected generic term. Trademark owners must take active steps to protect their marks from becoming generic.

Examples of marks that often are used in a generic manner (and their proper alternatives) include "Kleenex/facial tissue," "Xerox/photocopy," and "Google/Internet search."

If you would like additional trademark information, please contact us by filling out the form on this page, calling 858-350-3124 (San Diego) or toll free at 800-361-1961.

For additional trademark information resources, please visit our trademark resources page.

 
 

Achtel Law Firm, APC
Business & Estate Counselors
12625 High Bluff Drive
Suite 103
San Diego, CA 92130
Phone: (858) 350-3124
Fax: (858) 356-0188
Directions to our office

 
 
  The materials provided within this website are for general information, educational, and promotional purposes only. They are not intended as, and should not be taken as, legal advice. Individuals and entities having legal questions should consult with an attorney to fully address their legal matters based on an analysis of the particular facts. The attorney members of the firm are licensed to practice law in the state of California, and otherwise as noted.
© 2004-2005  Achtel Law Firm, APC Sitemap